Where Zapier stops, Support Fusion starts.

Zapier is excellent at automation inside your own stack. Keeping a ticket reconciled across two companies, both ways, is a different job.

Book a demo

Two different jobs

Zapier

General-purpose automation. When a trigger fires, run an action. Strong for internal task routing and connecting apps inside your own stack. Charges per task.

Support Fusion

Bi-directional ticket sync across company boundaries. Your ticket and your client's stay matched, both ways, through every update, reopen, and attachment, for the life of the ticket.

What Zapier leaves to you

The native connectors give you triggers and actions. The rest is yours to build and own.

Two-way state reconciliation

When both sides update the same ticket, something has to decide which version wins and tell the other side. That logic is yours to write.

Comment vs work note routing

A public reply and an internal note must not cross the boundary. Routing them correctly, both ways, is not a trigger and an action.

Status mapping and reopens

Your "Resolved" and their "Closed Complete" are different fields. The reopen path needs to hold on both sides.

Attachment streaming

File size limits differ between platforms. Moving attachments reliably in both directions is its own project.

Ownership when things break

Zapier is a toolkit. When a sync fails during a P1, the person on call is whoever built the flow.

Zapier vs Support Fusion

	Zapier	Support Fusion
What it is	General-purpose automation platform	Managed bi-directional ticket sync
Best at	"Do X when Y happens" across thousands of apps	Keeping a ticket matched across two companies for its whole life
Cost model	Per task - every action step is metered	Fixed connections, not per-action billing
Who runs it	You - build it, maintain it, fix it	We do - managed service with central monitoring
Two-way state reconciliation	You write the logic	Built in
Comment vs work note routing	You build it	Built in
Reopens and status mapping	Manual	Built in
When a sync breaks	The person who built it fixes it	We monitor, surface, and resolve. Either side can cut the connection immediately
Security posture	SOC 2 Type II on enterprise tier	ISO 27001 certified, SOC 2 in progress. Credentials stay in each organisation's own tenancy
Best fit	Internal automation and task plumbing	Inter-company ticket sync at volume

When Zapier is the right call

For simple, low-volume automation inside your own stack, Zapier is a strong choice. When a ticket has to stay reconciled across two companies, both ways, at volume, you have crossed from automation into integration.

Common questions

Can't Zapier sync ConnectWise and ServiceNow? It has connectors for both.

It can create and update records across them. What it does not handle out of the box is two-way state reconciliation, comment routing, reopen logic, and attachment streaming - the parts that keep a ticket honest over its whole life.

We already built a Zapier flow. Why move?

The flow itself may work. The ongoing cost is maintaining it as platforms update, the per-task bill as ticket volume grows, and the knowledge sitting with one person.

Which platforms does Support Fusion connect?

PSA: ConnectWise, Autotask, HaloPSA, Syncro. ITSM and help desk: ServiceNow, ServiceDesk Plus, Freshservice, HaloITSM, Jira, Freshdesk, Zendesk.

Is Support Fusion a Zapier alternative?

Different tools for different jobs. Zapier is excellent for general automation inside your own stack. Support Fusion handles one job: keeping a ticket reconciled across two companies, both ways, for the life of that ticket.

No-one has to be the glue.

See how Support Fusion keeps your PSA and your client's ITSM in sync.

Book a demo